The field problem
School — Upper Egypt
Final earth-resistance readings changed repeatedly during handover.
why the obvious answer can be misleading
The technician used a short test span and did not place the potential probe according to the intended Fall-of-Potential geometry. The auxiliary electrodes remained too close to the system influence zone, so movement of the probes changed the measured result.
Why it failed
The technician used a short test span and did not place the potential probe according to the intended Fall-of-Potential geometry.
The auxiliary electrodes remained too close to the system influence zone, so movement of the probes changed the measured result.
Follow the engineering
Switch between the field condition and the engineering concept. Trace the path and examine what changes.
Inspect the engineering detail
What changes
Re-establish the test line outside the electrode influence zone, use the applicable Fall-of-Potential/62% procedure for the electrode geometry, and confirm the result by moving the potential probe around the nominal point rather than relying on one reading.
Correction & verification
Re-establish the test line outside the electrode influence zone, use the applicable Fall-of-Potential/62% procedure for the electrode geometry, and confirm the result by moving the potential probe around the nominal point rather than relying on one reading.
Verification recorded in the case
- A valid result should show a sufficiently stable region around the selected potential-probe position. If the curve does not stabilise, extend the test distance or change method.
- Record as-built topology and connection points.
- Repeat the measurement or functional test under a defined condition.
- Confirm continuity and mechanical integrity of the corrected path.
- Document instrument/setup, environmental condition and test method.
- Close the NCR/case only when evidence supports the conclusion.
References & project context
References are reproduced from the PIS casebook. Select the governing edition and project acceptance criteria before using them for a design. The diagrams explain the concept, rather than define construction dimensions.
IEC 61557-5; accepted earth-resistance test methodology; instrument manufacturer guidance.
PIS reviewed field handbook · PIS-CS-004
View the original social cardThe engineering lesson
Before redesigning an earth grid, prove that the measurement itself is valid.
Take the lesson into your next design review.
