Skip to content
PIS logoIntegrated protection professionally delivered

Lightning protection around hazardous chemicals

The wrong lightning system can add an ignition source.

Water-treatment plantIndustrial3 min read
Interception separated from hazardous contentsEngineered approach for PIS-CS-018. Assess a free-standing or non-attached interception arrangement. Calculate protection volume and separation for the actual installation. Coordinate controlled down paths, bonding and earth termination. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 018Interception separated from hazardous contentsENGINEERED APPROACHASSESS SEPARATIONProtection geometry and separation must be calculated for the facility.1231Assess a free-standing ornon-attached interceptionarrangement.2Calculate protection volumeand separation for the actualinstallation.3Coordinate controlled downpaths, bonding and earthtermination.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved

Engineering concept / vector field note

01

The field problem

Water-Treatment Plant — Hazardous Chemicals

Conventional directly attached lightning protection was proposed on containers/structures containing hazardous chemical or flammable material.

why the obvious answer can be misleading

Direct lightning-current routing on or immediately adjacent to hazardous contents can introduce heating, sparking, side-flash and electromagnetic effects. The risk must be assessed as a hazardous-facility problem, not a normal roof detail.

02

Why it failed

Direct lightning-current routing on or immediately adjacent to hazardous contents can introduce heating, sparking, side-flash and electromagnetic effects.

The risk must be assessed as a hazardous-facility problem, not a normal roof detail.

03

Follow the engineering

Switch between the field condition and the engineering concept. Trace the path and examine what changes.

Inspect the engineering detail

Interception separated from hazardous contentsEngineered approach for PIS-CS-018. Assess a free-standing or non-attached interception arrangement. Calculate protection volume and separation for the actual installation. Coordinate controlled down paths, bonding and earth termination. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 018Interception separated from hazardous contentsENGINEERED APPROACHASSESS SEPARATIONProtection geometry and separation must be calculated for the facility.1231Assess a free-standing ornon-attached interceptionarrangement.2Calculate protection volumeand separation for the actualinstallation.3Coordinate controlled downpaths, bonding and earthtermination.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved

Case 018 · Engineered approach

100%
Interception separated from hazardous contentsEngineered approach for PIS-CS-018. Assess a free-standing or non-attached interception arrangement. Calculate protection volume and separation for the actual installation. Coordinate controlled down paths, bonding and earth termination. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 018Interception separated from hazardous contentsENGINEERED APPROACHASSESS SEPARATIONProtection geometry and separation must be calculated for the facility.1231Assess a free-standing ornon-attached interceptionarrangement.2Calculate protection volumeand separation for the actualinstallation.3Coordinate controlled downpaths, bonding and earthtermination.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved

Scroll to inspect. Numbered details match the notes below the drawing. Conceptual geometry; use the case text for the engineering requirements.

What changes

Use an engineered non-attached/interception arrangement where required, with free-standing masts/catenary concepts, calculated protection volume, separation distance, controlled down-conductor paths and coordinated bonding/earthing.

Teaching schematic · not to scale© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved
04

Correction & verification

Use an engineered non-attached/interception arrangement where required, with free-standing masts/catenary concepts, calculated protection volume, separation distance, controlled down-conductor paths and coordinated bonding/earthing.

Verification recorded in the case

  • Verify protection geometry, separation and bonding before commissioning.
  • Record as-built topology and connection points.
  • Repeat the measurement or functional test under a defined condition.
  • Confirm continuity and mechanical integrity of the corrected path.
  • Document instrument/setup, environmental condition and test method.
  • Close the NCR/case only when evidence supports the conclusion.
References & project context

References are reproduced from the PIS casebook. Select the governing edition and project acceptance criteria before using them for a design. The diagrams explain the concept, rather than define construction dimensions.

IEC 62305-3; NFPA 780 where contractually applicable; hazardous-area requirements.

PIS reviewed field handbook · PIS-CS-018

05

The engineering lesson

In hazardous facilities, interception location is part of ignition-risk control.

Take the lesson into your next design review.

Keep exploring

Connected lessons.

All cases
Heritage protection starts with consequence of lossEngineered approach for PIS-CS-019. Assess lightning risk for the specific heritage building. Include irreplaceable loss and service-related risks. Select coordinated measures from the documented assessment. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 019Heritage protection starts with consequence of lossENGINEERED APPROACHOccupancy, incoming services and irreplaceable loss belong in theassessment.1231Assess lightning risk for thespecific heritage building.2Include irreplaceable lossand service-related risks.3Select coordinated measuresfrom the documentedassessment.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved
19

Lightning protection

Protecting an irreplaceable heritage building

Fourteen metres high did not make the contents replaceable.

Luxor3 min
Separate assessments for adjacent towersEngineered approach for PIS-CS-026. Perform a project-specific risk assessment for each structure. Assess interception geometry separately from risk classification. Select each protection arrangement from its own documented inputs. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 026Separate assessments for adjacent towersENGINEERED APPROACHRISK ARISK BNeighbouring height informs geometry; each building still needs a riskstudy.1231Perform a project-specificrisk assessment for eachstructure.2Assess interception geometryseparately from riskclassification.3Select each protectionarrangement from its owndocumented inputs.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved
26

Lightning protection

Two towers need two risk assessments

The shorter tower was not automatically protected by the taller tower.

New Administrative Capital3 min
Restore the omitted façade routeEngineered approach for PIS-CS-028. Reroute the conflicted conductor through coordinated service zones. Preserve the required distribution and earth-termination interfaces. Keep test joints accessible; inspect before cladding closure. Conceptual teaching detail, not an as-built drawing or construction instruction. © PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved.PIS ENGINEERING / CASE 028Restore the omitted façade routeENGINEERED APPROACHCLADDINGROUTE RESTOREDCoordinate concealment and test-joint access before the façade is closed.1231Reroute the conflictedconductor through coordinatedservice zones.2Preserve the requireddistribution andearth-termination interfaces.3Keep test joints accessible;inspect before claddingclosure.READ THE DETAILEquipment, joints and current-path interfaces are shown in context.Conceptual teaching plate · no project dimensions or acceptance limits impliedPIS / REV 03© PIS Engineering Academy · All rights reserved
28

Lightning protection

A façade conflict is not a reason to remove a path

The Architect Removed One Side of the Lightning Protection System.

High-rise tower3 min